heroicrelics.org
Return to Franklin Institute

Lunar Module LTA-3D

Sitting in the Franklin Institute's "back yard" sits Lunar Test Article 3D. It certainly is an odd place for a lunar module!

The Franklin Institute has a page regarding the lunar module test article. The pictures there were apparently taken some time ago, as the side CCW from the hatch features an American flag and the side CW from the hatch has a patch of gold foil; these were absent when I visited.

Just by looking at it, one would be inclined to think it was just another boilerplate, of so-so fidelity. However, according to the Apollo Experience Report - Lunar Module Structural Subsystem, LTA-3 was a "structural test vehicle," used during the design verification process. It underwent the same types of conditions in the same experience that would be experienced during an actual mission, including ascent stage cabin pressurization and exposure to vibration tests to simulate both the ascent and descent engine loads. It was loaded in a SLA, stacked with a CSM, and exposed to vibration and acoustic tests to simulate a launch. It also underwent drop tests to simulate a lunar landing.

Various problems cropped up, uncovering defects in the manufacturing process and flaws in the design; appropriate corrective actions were taken. In preparation for one test, stress corrosion cracks were discovered in aft equipment rack support struts; an inspection revealed 23 cracked struts. This resulted in changing the manufacture of the struts for production lunar modules.

LTA-3's final series of tests was to verify the docking interface structure; information about this test can be found in Plan for Unit Load Tests of LTA-3 and CM 2S-1 (Docked Configuration).

At some point, the ascent and descent stages of LTA-3 were split up; this is apparently the descent stage with a fabricated ascent stage more representative of the design which landed on the Moon. LTA-3's ascent stage is at the Kansas Cosmosphere.

 
dsc35335.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35335.jpg
dsc35334.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35334.jpg
dsc35326.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35326.jpg
dsc35252.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35252.jpg
dsc35368.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35368.jpg
dsc35358.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35358.jpg
dsc35346.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35346.jpg
dsc35340.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35340.jpg
dsc35338.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35338.jpg
dsc35332.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35332.jpg
dsc35272.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35272.jpg
dsc35268.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35268.jpg
dsc35366.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35366.jpg
dsc35355.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35355.jpg
dsc35351.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35351.jpg
dsc35343.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35343.jpg
dsc35337.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35337.jpg
dsc35330.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35330.jpg
dsc35328.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35328.jpg
dsc35254.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35254.jpg
dsc35360.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35360.jpg
dsc35353.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35353.jpg
dsc35348.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35348.jpg
dsc35341.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35341.jpg
dsc35374.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35374.jpg
dsc35359.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35359.jpg
dsc35372.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35372.jpg
dsc35266.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35266.jpg
dsc35265.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35265.jpg
dsc35262.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35262.jpg
dsc35263.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35263.jpg
dsc35314.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35314.jpg
dsc35316.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35316.jpg
dsc35318.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35318.jpg
dsc35323.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35323.jpg
dsc35322.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35322.jpg
dsc35317.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35317.jpg
dsc35325.jpg at Franklin Institute
dsc35325.jpg
   
Return to Franklin Institute